<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transporter Directory Synchronisation and Sub-Domain Routing Between Exchange 2007 (2010) and Lotus Domino r8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emailmigrations.com/transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emailmigrations.com/transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8</link>
	<description>A real-world guide on how to achieve a successful email migration project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://emailmigrations.com/transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 09:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emailmigrations.com/?p=360#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hi there,   thanks for the comment/question.  I assume you are using sub-domain routing similar to my description.  For the sub domain routing I can further explain it in two parts:

1.  Domino to Exchange.   You will create a new Foreign Domain, called Exchange, and use Dir Sync to import the Exchange mailbox addresses into the Domino Address Book.  They will appear in the Domino Address Book under the new Domain Exchange, with an internal Domino user name of  &quot;&lt;alias&gt;/Exchange&quot; , and a forwarding address of &quot;alias@exchange.contuso.com@exchange&quot;.   Then when someone emails that address from Domino the email is sent to the Exchange Foreign Domain, which you created, and the &quot;Exchange&quot; part is stripped off as the email is routed through the connector to Exchange, leaving the normal SMTP address to match up to the Exchange mailbox.

2. Exchange to Domino.  Setup the Transporter Suite Directory Connector to stamp the Domino addresses in Exchange with alias@notes.contuso.com.  Then in Exchange you have a Send Connector with that Address Space to route to Domino.  Domino is set to receive mail for that address space in the Global Domain document.

The Microsoft Transporter document covers this is good detail.

I have further customised the Transporter TBL files to use firstname.lastname@exchange.contuso.com  as well, as it is more clear when emails are being addressed by users.  I will post the configuration details shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,   thanks for the comment/question.  I assume you are using sub-domain routing similar to my description.  For the sub domain routing I can further explain it in two parts:</p>
<p>1.  Domino to Exchange.   You will create a new Foreign Domain, called Exchange, and use Dir Sync to import the Exchange mailbox addresses into the Domino Address Book.  They will appear in the Domino Address Book under the new Domain Exchange, with an internal Domino user name of  &#8220;<alias>/Exchange&#8221; , and a forwarding address of &#8220;alias@exchange.contuso.com@exchange&#8221;.   Then when someone emails that address from Domino the email is sent to the Exchange Foreign Domain, which you created, and the &#8220;Exchange&#8221; part is stripped off as the email is routed through the connector to Exchange, leaving the normal SMTP address to match up to the Exchange mailbox.</p>
<p>2. Exchange to Domino.  Setup the Transporter Suite Directory Connector to stamp the Domino addresses in Exchange with <a href="mailto:alias@notes.contuso.com">alias@notes.contuso.com</a>.  Then in Exchange you have a Send Connector with that Address Space to route to Domino.  Domino is set to receive mail for that address space in the Global Domain document.</p>
<p>The Microsoft Transporter document covers this is good detail.</p>
<p>I have further customised the Transporter TBL files to use <a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@exchange.contuso.com">firstname.lastname@exchange.contuso.com</a>  as well, as it is more clear when emails are being addressed by users.  I will post the configuration details shortly.</alias></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Dangwal</title>
		<link>http://emailmigrations.com/transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Dangwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 10:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emailmigrations.com/?p=360#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi

Thanks for this post.it is really awesome.

I will appreciate if you can provide the complete mail routing from domino to exchange and vice versa using sub domain architecture.
for ex. when a client sends a mail from lotus client to exchange user it will check the domain part of the email address and will check the foreign SMTP domain document for the virtual domain of the user and will redirect the mails to the Exchange server which is listed in the connection document.

please provide the detailed step from bit the ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Thanks for this post.it is really awesome.</p>
<p>I will appreciate if you can provide the complete mail routing from domino to exchange and vice versa using sub domain architecture.<br />
for ex. when a client sends a mail from lotus client to exchange user it will check the domain part of the email address and will check the foreign SMTP domain document for the virtual domain of the user and will redirect the mails to the Exchange server which is listed in the connection document.</p>
<p>please provide the detailed step from bit the ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://emailmigrations.com/transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emailmigrations.com/?p=360#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the detailed feedback on the website.   You have provided valuable additional details on the pitfalls of coexistence.  The advice I have passed on is based on my experiences, and certainly, overall, the sub-domain solution to co-existence gives the better &quot;user experience&quot; during co-existence when compared to alternatives.  However, I appreciate that there are many different scenarios that may be presented where this may not be the case - such as the ones you mention.   Good to have the information available here for people to read and make informed decisions on their situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the detailed feedback on the website.   You have provided valuable additional details on the pitfalls of coexistence.  The advice I have passed on is based on my experiences, and certainly, overall, the sub-domain solution to co-existence gives the better &#8220;user experience&#8221; during co-existence when compared to alternatives.  However, I appreciate that there are many different scenarios that may be presented where this may not be the case &#8211; such as the ones you mention.   Good to have the information available here for people to read and make informed decisions on their situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://emailmigrations.com/transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emailmigrations.com/?p=360#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the continued interest in the website.   To answer your question, I would recommend staying with the the two namespaces unless there was a good reason not to.   If you wish to not use the two namespaces (sub-domain routing) then you can do it, but you can&#039;t have Address Book entries for users on the opposing mail systems.  But you can set Domino and Exchange to route &quot;non-matched&quot; emails to a smart-host.  But you lose out on so much with that approach.   There is an impact using sub-domains but in my experience the pros outweigh the cons.  Happy to hear further information on why you are keen to not use the sub-domain solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the continued interest in the website.   To answer your question, I would recommend staying with the the two namespaces unless there was a good reason not to.   If you wish to not use the two namespaces (sub-domain routing) then you can do it, but you can&#8217;t have Address Book entries for users on the opposing mail systems.  But you can set Domino and Exchange to route &#8220;non-matched&#8221; emails to a smart-host.  But you lose out on so much with that approach.   There is an impact using sub-domains but in my experience the pros outweigh the cons.  Happy to hear further information on why you are keen to not use the sub-domain solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry Hiltz</title>
		<link>http://emailmigrations.com/transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry Hiltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emailmigrations.com/?p=360#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, however, when using internal subdomains for routing and using only the Transporter Suite as an interface for directory synchronization you are still in fact missing a very key point when dealing with successful coexistence.

This is the known issue surrounding changes to repeating meetings between Domino and Exchange. When repeating meetings are modified using SMTP mail between Domino and Exchange, there is are significant problems associated with these changes not being properly reflected on the other platform.   this is due to the fact when Notes clients see any form of SMTP address, they perform iCal and MIME Conversions at the workstation level.  With differing versions of workstation client implementations within a signal company you get differing results.

Additionally when messages are sent between the platforms as well as to external entities, these internal subdomains are also sent to the external people.  As a direct result when the external entity performs a reply to all, they receive non delivery failures for the people listed with the sub domain values.  They only way to circumvent this is to establish MX Records for the specific sub domains on the dirty side of the firewall.

Additionally you have no solution for work-flow enabled messages generated from applications.  More often than not in complex Domino infrastructures, you will encounter applications that send programmatic objects to users that were on Notes.  When the server or the user sends these, the workstation changes the message to mime immediately, thereby removing and code that was intended to be sent to the user.

I would suggest that you take these into consideration when considering any Enterprise level migration or you will leave the customer with a very poor and half thought coexistence solution.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, however, when using internal subdomains for routing and using only the Transporter Suite as an interface for directory synchronization you are still in fact missing a very key point when dealing with successful coexistence.</p>
<p>This is the known issue surrounding changes to repeating meetings between Domino and Exchange. When repeating meetings are modified using SMTP mail between Domino and Exchange, there is are significant problems associated with these changes not being properly reflected on the other platform.   this is due to the fact when Notes clients see any form of SMTP address, they perform iCal and MIME Conversions at the workstation level.  With differing versions of workstation client implementations within a signal company you get differing results.</p>
<p>Additionally when messages are sent between the platforms as well as to external entities, these internal subdomains are also sent to the external people.  As a direct result when the external entity performs a reply to all, they receive non delivery failures for the people listed with the sub domain values.  They only way to circumvent this is to establish MX Records for the specific sub domains on the dirty side of the firewall.</p>
<p>Additionally you have no solution for work-flow enabled messages generated from applications.  More often than not in complex Domino infrastructures, you will encounter applications that send programmatic objects to users that were on Notes.  When the server or the user sends these, the workstation changes the message to mime immediately, thereby removing and code that was intended to be sent to the user.</p>
<p>I would suggest that you take these into consideration when considering any Enterprise level migration or you will leave the customer with a very poor and half thought coexistence solution.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Dangwal</title>
		<link>http://emailmigrations.com/transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Dangwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emailmigrations.com/?p=360#comment-12</guid>
		<description>This solution requires two namespaces, one at domino side and another at exchange end.

@notes.cuntaso.com
@exchange.cuntaso.com

how to achieve a solution with only one namespace at both the ends. i.e @cuntaso.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This solution requires two namespaces, one at domino side and another at exchange end.</p>
<p>@notes.cuntaso.com<br />
@exchange.cuntaso.com</p>
<p>how to achieve a solution with only one namespace at both the ends. i.e @cuntaso.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://emailmigrations.com/transporter-directory-synchronisation-between-exchange-2007-2010-and-lotus-notes-r8#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emailmigrations.com/?p=360#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment - good to know people are using the information !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment &#8211; good to know people are using the information !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

